no- my point was just that i use something huge in order to test the network if something seems wrong.
and something was definately off this weekend. On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, David Gillies wrote: > The best thing about soulseek for me is not in finding lots of well > known stuff (like nirvana) but being able to find lesser known stuff > that I can't find on any other p2p network. > > Try typing something 313 related in soulseek and then try it on another > more well known network (perhaps like Limewire or something) and compare > the differences. Then you'll see when everyone here talks it up. > > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 17:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > i did notice the search function not turning up too much > > > > i used Nirvana as a test,, and only came up with a few hundred files > > instead of the usual thousands > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: > > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > > > From: "J.T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >there are major problems with the slsk search function lately, i > > > imagine it will be fixed soon... > > > >soulseek kills the rest, when it's working correctly > > > > > > didnt realise that they were having bugs. even when they do, its > > > so worth it to just stick it out. i always give them money for the > > > DL priveledges too, with that its honestly the best access to the > > > best music ive ever seen. you can literally find just about anything. > >
