Yeh but that's my point. I can respect a tribute. If it's well done. I personally think no music is made in a bubble, and that if we all approached our creative expressions as a tribute to our inspirations then maybe the bar might be a little higher and there wouldn't be so much crap about. That's what differentiates ugly edits/moxie style stuff from the mashup mania stuff to me. Ones done outta greed and the others done outta respect. (Mind, RDJ, theo, et al. still might come out and say they were just doing it for the cash :) I mean most uk techno I like sounds like something from detroit circa 95-99. but it's well done and interesting and I'm a sucher for interesting, well done stuff of any style. Take rick wade, I feel like I own every record he's put out (and only got like four). But that doesn't take away the fact that every one of them is well done, so I see why people continue to buy 'em. I kinda think it's cool to see interpretations of someone's style through anoth! er filter. Dunno how I'd feel if it was my stuff though. And yeah, those are the two I was guessing too (larry and drex). OH! Look! A ferret! Hahahahaha!
Kamal K. Stoddard Turner Broadcasting Systems ** I am exactly what I wanted to become since I was 5 years old. Since 5 year olds are not noted for mature judgement and sometimes aspire to piracy or gunfighting, this is not necessarily a sign of success. ** > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) Apex twin > > > >Okay, so call it out then. Who's style is he jacking specifically? > > Anal_lord No 1. Drexciya > Anal_lord No.2. Mr Fingers/Larry Heard > > Not hating on him as such, just can't get my head round why > so many people go for his s**t! When, he's basically said and > named some of these tracks as a tribute, don't understand why > so many think they're so great!! > > Everybody's wierd. Sometimes I think I'm the only normal > person on this planet. > > ho ho ho. > _________________________________________________________________ > --------------------- End of message text -------------------- > > This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, > non-business capacity and is not on behalf of > PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. > > PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor > outgoing and incoming e-mails and other > telecommunications on its e-mail and > telecommunications systems. By replying > to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. >
