Ok, sorry Martin but, 'Ae'? Who 'e? Ken
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 March 2005 14:56 To: Odeluga, Ken Cc: darnistle; [email protected] Subject: Re: (313) Monobox It's pretty deep that's for sure, the masked layers only give so much over the 'phones, crank that sucker up tho and sit in the middle of the speakers, that's the stuff, right there... Some of the new Ae album is like that, just need to get use't to the harsh cold sounds, there's certain little "soul" to found... Martin On 29 Mar 2005, at 12:59, Odeluga, Ken wrote: > Glad someone else likes sit! I got the distinct impression when it came > out a couple of years ago, that people who were discovering the more > melodic 'Who Taught You Math,' 'Point Blank' and 'Wire To Wire' Hood, > would rather ignore this harder, darker, more archetypally-minimal > incarnation. The LP has actually grown on me. After about two years of > listening to it on and off, I'm noticing all sorts of themes in there > which I hadn't before. For instance, I think there is a very > subtly-used, Philip Glass sample on one of the tracks! (I could be > tripping but I don't think so.) > > I find the Logistic Remix project a little puzzling. I mean, the tracks > no longer sound anything like the original. Now that's not necessarily > a > bad thing: there have been some very nice results imo, but it just > seems > to portray unwittingly that the general atmosphere and tone of the > originals (which the remixes are totally bereft of) was in some way > defective. > > Having said all that, the Substance rework is Peter Kuschnereit at his > best (even if he might as well just have handed in a brand new track!) >
