considering that it has gotten down to the public issue of the city decide
how to monitarily manage a public space then the business dealing around
the festival are open to public debate.
if the article was simply 'movement doesn't pay people' or somthing
equally sensationalistic, i would agree. but it's a matter of public
policy now, so total disclosure time.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Cyclone Wehner wrote:
I can't believe how negative the press is in Detroit!
The writers are very respectable and know their stuff more than elsewhere -
it's the tone that surprises me.
I see the writers' dilemma - but by exposing all the business they're
ultimately scaring off any investment.
http://www.freep.com/entertainment/music/fest13e_20050413.htm
