UR records have to be among some of the hardest to mix don't you
think...
Martin
On 30 Jun 2005, at 11:17, Güclüer, Hansi wrote:
sure! when i get to my record collection. probably saturday...
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: to 2005-06-30 12:01
Till: Güclüer, Hansi; robin; 313
Kopia:
Ämne: RE: (313) UR - Amazon
Hey why don't you do that anyway? I believe you but I'd like to see
it!
Maybe you could post up a url.
Ken
Ken Odeluga
Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk
Dow Jones Newswires
10 Fleet Place
Limeburner Lane
LONDON EC4M 7QN
020 7842 9297
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: "Güclüer, Hansi" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 June 2005 10:55
To: robin; 313
Subject: SV: (313) UR - Amazon
i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great
but
amazon is not one of those is it???
it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out
i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if
you don't believe me!!! ;-)
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23
Till: 313
Kopia:
Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon
Odeluga, Ken wrote:
>>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have
>
> missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they
> sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you
> have to know the records to mix them properly :)
>
> Fred
>
> ***
>
> ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ...
it's all
> good, imo.
yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as
time has
gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not
splicing tapes
etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give
character.
i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain
looseness is
nice on the ear.
robin...
