Come on Alex, that's one good looking mannequin.

On 11/22/05, vmax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes they have been.. ;)
>
> Hard to belive that one could be concederd a sex offender for trying
> to hump a mannequin..
> I did not know that mannequins had rights...  My how times have
> changed..
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-13466788,00.html
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > --------------------- End of message text --------------------
> >
> > This e-mail is sent by the above named in
> > their individual, non-business capacity and
> > is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
> >
> > PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
> > outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
> > telecommunications on its e-mail and
> > telecommunications systems. By replying
> > to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to