Come on Alex, that's one good looking mannequin.
On 11/22/05, vmax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes they have been.. ;) > > Hard to belive that one could be concederd a sex offender for trying > to hump a mannequin.. > I did not know that mannequins had rights... My how times have > changed.. > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-13466788,00.html > > _________________________________________________________________ > > --------------------- End of message text -------------------- > > > > This e-mail is sent by the above named in > > their individual, non-business capacity and > > is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. > > > > PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor > > outgoing and incoming e-mails and other > > telecommunications on its e-mail and > > telecommunications systems. By replying > > to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. > > > > > > > >