ok, i'll bite. who would you book instead of these guys? and i don't think it's not that you're not entitled to have critical opinions, it's just that you could probably put them in a more positive manner. even if you didn't mean it as a personal attack, it kinda sounded like it.
maybe think through the situation greg and the rest of the kontrol krew are in-- they've been throwing this night at a personal financial risk. i know they're trying to book acts that represent the music they love, but they also want folks to show up, so they might book artists that are also a bit "trendy." oh well-- it's still been high quality music, with lots of pretty boys and girls dancing. does the trick for me. if you think that it's possible to throw a techno night in SF with even more out-there talent, step up. i'll come check it out. (but don't come cryin' if the crowd is 75 chin-strokin dudes, all of whom dj or produce.) everyone take it easy and eat some friggin turkey already. -d --- Wojtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... Since when has it become wrong to > express your critical > opinion of a show on this list?!?!? Is it now > wrong to point out on > the list that yes, minimal techno and house DOES go > beyond the glitchy > stuff? Just because I chose to point out the > limited approach of your > promoter "homeboys" you feel the need to personally > attack me?!? > > Did I personally attack any of the producers? No. > The promoters? No. > Does this mean that you need to "represent" the fact > that these > producers only book (thus far aside from Dan Bell) > flavor of the moment > glitch producers, while claiming to "represent" > minimal techno as a > whole?
