It sounds like what you're saying is that it's ok for him to shoot his
mouth and fabricate additional influences that aren't owed to him because
of everything he *has* done.
MEK
"seek"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t.net> To
<[email protected]>
03/04/06 08:25 AM cc
Subject
Re: (313) Re : (313) Frankie Bones
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tristan Watkins"
> I mean, how many people outside of the mid-Atlantic would actually go see
> him if he were playing in your city tonight? How many people still follow
> his music? I honestly don't know because he's never mattered to me in
either
> sense, but I'm happy to take an interest if I've been missing out all
this
> time.
The music he's released since his heyday in the 80s isn't on par with that
stuff,
and again, it's dance tracks: for mixing, mostly: not 'home listening'.
The point
here isn't about what he's done lately, but what he has done versus what
some
here claimed he'd not done. It's easy to say, Frankie shoots his mouth off
and fills his own balloon, because he has/does, but he has also done tons
more for electronic dance music culture than those on this list that are
shooting off
their mouths slagging him, combined x1000.
Word.
seek
- (313) Re : (313) Frankie Bones Poivrenoir
- RE: (313) Re : (313) Frankie Bones Tristan Watkins
- Re: (313) Re : (313) Frankie Bones seek
- Re: (313) Re : (313) Frankie Bones Michael . Elliot-Knight
- RE: (313) Re : (313) Frankie Bones Michael . Elliot-Knight
