I'm confused now. Can someone summarise or conclude this thread for me. Is analogue better than digital or vice versa???
-----Original Message----- From: Brian Prince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 4 September 2006 6:35 a.m. To: kent williams Cc: list 313 Subject: Re: (313) The Laptop Debate - the imitation of sound kent williams wrote: > Honestly, what matters besides the actual compositions? I'm enough of > a studio rat to care about things are produced, but the actual method > that someone uses is irrelevant, except as it facilitates the result. > It's not like you can't make sh*t tracks with analog gear. Self-appointed "golden ears" dismiss feeling and creativity, because anyone can appreciate those qualities in music (though not always at first blush, since some tastes are acquired), whereas it takes a genuine superior class of lonely douche to prioritize the production pipeline in their evaluation of a record. see also: missing the point of art - bp This e-mail message and any accompanying attachments may contain information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message.
