:) well, then take some jazz trak,compress the audio down to 128 kbps do the same to your average laptop trak..and guess what..the quality sucks in both cases, but the laptop trak sounds incomparably more bright, stiff, lifeless... than the other one. how come?
i'll tell you when you learn to accept reality as it is. /12 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "313" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 2:21 AM Subject: Re: (313) The Laptop Debate. > > It's myspace... those are mp3's... low quality mp3's at that because > that is all that myspace will let you upload. > > You can not reproduce a warm sound with a compressed music file. (ie: > mp3s) Most of the audio spectrum that compression filters prioritize > is at the high end because the higher you go on the spectrum the more > detail and bandwidth you need to even approximate the sound. > > mp3's sound crunchy and dry... even the high quality ones. In order > to make a proper comparison you're going to have to either go get a > copy of the real thing, or download an uncompressed wave file, burn > it to a cd, and listen to it on your normal system. > > Maybe this is pointless too... > > At 04:53 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > >listened to the first one (which was a pain in the *ss as im on a dial up > >till 25th) , i dont know what to say.. > >you surely are familiar with any of the examples of "warm sound" i mentioned > >earlier? > > > >i'll pretend i havent heard anyone saying "boiling hot" today .. > > > >/12 > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Neil Wiernik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[email protected]> > >Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 5:18 PM > >Subject: Re: (313) The Laptop Debate. > > > > > > > > > > fair enough > > > go here > > > http://www.myspace.com/nawmusic > > > the tracks from the green nights orange days record are prime examples of > > > my music mastered BY twerk sounding warm so first listen to mid winter > > > sailboat ride, and penny fishing north of main > > > the 2 tracks there as part of the unrelease titled birch bark ceiling wax > > > and 4 by 6 are made using the same technology, tools and recorded only a > > > month after the green nights orange days record was but was NOT mastered > > > by twerk but rather mastered by someone else using a similar studio set > > > up to what twerk uses. > > > you can directly hear the difference right away... > > > neil... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, v12 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ^honestly, i gave you examples/titles as i know what i am saying. > > > > if you say the opposite -pls stop the general statements about some > >ghost > > > > recordings and give me examples/titles in return. > > > > that really saves time. btw twerk/sutekh and related producers are > > > > repsonsible for the most absurd > > > > audio ive heard so let me hear the "boiling hot" you talk about.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================ > > > www.phoniq.net > > > releases available on: > > > www.noisefactoryrecords.com > > > publication: > > > www.vagueterrain.net > > > > >
