are you the same kind of person who gives away the plot of a movie to friends before they go see it? ;) i'm of the opinion that listening to a dj mix is more interesting and enjoyable if i don't know what's what before i listen. it doesn't take long to download a mix and seek through it to get a feel for the style. are you THAT pressed for time that you can't take 5 minutes to scan through the mp3 to hear if you want to explore it further?
also, why bother listening to something if you know all the music presented? i'm much more interested in hearing things i haven't heard before than seeking out music i am already familiar with. that being said, i see your point, i just prefer to do it this way. i'd say 90% of the dj mixes i listen to have no tracklistings, and if i hear a track i like, i hunt it down with a fiery passion. sometimes (rarely) i can get in touch with the dj who compiled the mix. if there's a huge outcry for me to post the tracklist, i suppose i will. for now, no spoilers! On 9/7/07, Tristan Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank Glazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "list 313" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:53 PM > Subject: (313) slightly off topic: my latest dj mix > > > > email me *after* listening if you want a tracklist. > > IMHO this is a really good way to get people *not* to listen to your mix. > There's simply too much good online listening going on these days to be > bothered with a grab bag. > > Tristan > ======= > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.phonopsia.co.uk > >
