ever try switching the gifts?  ;-)

MEK

"rob theakston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/24/2007 10:14:30 AM:

> hey now,
>
> yeah. i've been lurking. mainly i use 313 to stalk shake and pipetom.
> shake stopped responding to my strip tease videos on youtube and tom
> keeps returning all my flowers and candy. it's the only way i know how
> to get through to them.
>
>
> On 10/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > LOL
> > Welcome back Rob!  You been lurking all this time?
> >
> > MEK
> >
> > "rob theakston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/24/2007 08:43:41
AM:
> >
> > > I have a custom made mixer forged from the steel of King Arthur's
> > > Excalibur sword and certified awesome by Bea Arthur. Theo played on
it
> > > once at a gig we did a Burger King and it made him cry like a little
> > > girl when he tweaked the EQs. It has patent technology AI that
> > > predicts just how far you are going to kill certain ranges and does
it
> > > before you do.
> > >
> > > The guys in Optimo own one which they customized with supersonic gain
> > > (I called it "Helenkellerification"), custom spoiler and neon lights
> > > underneath. It sits on 22s.
> > >
> > > I almost made a third one for Phred, but he refused to get me the
> > > proper amount of Unicorn blood that I needed to make it happen. He
was
> > > having liberal guilt fits about the slaying of an animal in the name
> > > of sound.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/24/07, Paul Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Really!!
> > > >
> > > > Whats it like to play on??  Are the Eqs any good and are the FXs on
> > > > pointless??????????
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Toby Frith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 24 October 2007 14:33
> > > > To: Paul Kendrick; Alan Heneghan; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.;
313@hyperreal.org
> > > > Subject: RE: (313) votes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So does Corsica Studios....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paul Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 24 October 2007 14:35
> > > > To: Alan Heneghan; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org
> > > > Subject: RE: (313) votes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  http://www.funktion-one.com/FF6000.htm
> > > >
> > > > Al check the link, funktion 1 started re making them. The Panarama
Bar
> > > > in Berlin has one I think....
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Alan Heneghan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 24 October 2007 14:18
> > > > To: Paul Kendrick; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org
> > > > Subject: Re: (313) votes
> > > >
> > > > I own a A&H 62 and really like the sound of it, but find it a bit
> > > > cramped sometimes, but superb at home.
> > > >
> > > > I'm also a big fan of the Formula Sound PM80 (a mixer that has been
out
> > > > of production for over 10 years, very popular with sound engineers)
and
> > > > Ecler SCLAT100.
> > > > Both, 19" rack mounted, super clean signal path, no effects, tank
like
> > > > workhorses.
> > > > Played on an original UREI at a club once, but as mentioned, the
lack
> > of
> > > > EQ was daft.
> > > >
> > > > So out of the choices given, 62.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Alan Heneghan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > From: Paul Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:17:12 +0100
> > > > > To: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > <313@hyperreal.org>
> > > > > Conversation: (313) votes
> > > > > Subject: RE: (313) votes
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with Tom on this every mixer has unnecessary features and
> > lots
> > > >
> > > > > are badly laid out, gains on the back is just silly. I am still
to
> > > > > find the perfect mixer..
> > > > >
> > > > > Im currently using this, vestax PMC-CX
> > > > >
> > > > >  http://www.vestax.com/v/products/mixers/pmc-cx.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Not the best, EQ could be better and the filters are pointless I
> > don't
> > > >
> > > > > think mixers should have FX like this. It just annoys me when you
> > hear
> > > >
> > > > > people using them all the time to cover there bad mixing.....if
you
> > > > > want FX buy a separate unit
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: 24 October 2007 12:58
> > > > > To: 313@hyperreal.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: (313) votes
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/24/07, Alan Heneghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >> Gains on the back are to stop IDIOT DJs turning them up and
> > > > >> destroying
> > > > >
> > > > >> sound systems.
> > > > >
> > > > > so people who play 70's LP cuts next to 00's 12" cuts have to pay
the
> > > > > price for morons? wrong answer. that mixer with the gains on the
back
> > > > > is the biggest pile of sh*t ive ever used in my entire life.
> > > > >
> > > > > that said, i dont like any of the popular mixers. ive played on
a&hs,
> > > > > vestaxes, numarks, eclers, ranes, etc. not one of them has ever
made
> > > > > me feel like i needed to go out and buy one. that said, ive never
> > > > > messed with a classic rotary mixer either, but they dont have
built
> > in
> > > >
> > > > > EQs which is also stupid. the people who make and design mixers
are
> > > > > just plain old bad at what they do in my opinion. there's always
too
> > > > > much crap on there you dont need.
> > > > >
> > > > > tom
> > > >
> > > > For all the latest news and comment visit www.telegraph.co.uk.
This
> > > > message, its contents and any attachments to it are private,
> > > > confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege.  Any
> > > > unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination of the whole or part
of
> > > > this message (without our prior written consent) is prohibited.  If
you
> > > > are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately.
Incoming
> > > > and outgoing telephone calls to our offices may be monitored or
> > recorded
> > > > for training and quality control purposes and for confirming orders
and
> > > > information. Telegraph Media Group Limited is a limited liability
> > > > company registered in England and Wales (company number 451593).
Our
> > > > registered office address is: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London,
SW1W
> > > > 0DT.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >

Reply via email to