I'm sorry Tom, maybe it's my shortage of sleep or the mass amounts of coffee I had this morning... but I keep trying to comprehend what your saying with this and I can't . If its important, can you rephrase this? Make it simple so my mind thats too tired to keep up with the racing caffeine can comprehend.
On 3/14/08, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:32 AM, U&I Design > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OK... I'm sorry, but I practically choked on my morning coffee when I > > read this... Frank, I had such higher opinions of you than this!! > > You think the overall number of performers increased? They've > > consistently had 4 stages sometimes 5 throughout the years, same hours > > too.. simple math would tell you thats not humanly possible... that's > > Ok that you might've miscalculated that, forgivable... > > hmmm, im actually not so sure about that. i remember people getting > lots of longer sets earlier, these past couple of years many people > have been restricted to only 1 hour sets. i dont know if there have > definitely been more performers recently, but it feels like it is > possible with such short set times. > > > but here's > > where I choked on my coffee... you think there's a finite number of > > DJs and producers in Detroit?!! WHAT??!! Do some research, go back to > > school, learn about not just the history of where it began, but also > > where it has evolved to, because your comment is dead wrong. This > > city has more amazing DJs, Producers, and live musicians laying beats > > on techno tracks than I could ever book if I was producing a 5 day > > festival with 4 stages, making every stage Detroit only. > > there are cats all over the place in detroit! but even more > importantly than the actual detroit guys that they book, i think the > detroit related artists have been consistantly going down to the point > where many people playing probably dont even care that they are in > detroit as opposed to any other city. > > tom >
