Hmmm. Why no license fee waiver? Was it even an issue? Seems unlikely the ISP/website would even be anywhere near being sued for airing the tracks.
Odd. -----Original Message----- From: J.C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:08 AM To: 313 Mailing List Subject: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview On 8 September 2008, Andy Mitchell wrote: > (Note that the handful of musical tracks played during the interview > have been cut out because they're too cheap to pay the licensing fee > for 'em) > Personally, I wouldn't exactly call the rate structure for internet broadcasts "cheap". But then we're no longer 313 related either. :) Thanks for the link! -- San Francisco Bay Guardian's Readers Choice Award Winner: Best Radio DJ: http://www.sfbg.com/promo/pollpositions.php AIM: jckzsu (or kzsudj during my show.) "Opinions are my own only, and do not necessarily represent those of KZSU Radio or Stanford University." (or words to that effect.)
