> On 14 Jun 2019, at 11:25, Viktor Ashirov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:28 AM William Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Jun 2019, at 16:09, Viktor Ashirov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:26 PM William Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is the test case *just* testing if binary searching of attributes works?
>>> The test was to check if we can query the server for
>>> userCertificate=<data>, where <data> is a string representation of a
>>> base64 encoded x509 certificate. The original test was also passing
>>> binary representation (usercertificate;binary=...) to ldapsearch (to
>>> see if it translates correctly to base64).
>>
>> Thanks for telling me what the test is meant to do! This is what I wanted to
>> know from the start ...
> Thank you for your patience. I'm sorry I missed this email thread, I'd
> replied sooner to reduce the confusion.
> To give some context: this test case also was testing client tools
> (mozldap) to support binary filters. But this test case didn't age
> well, so your approach below should be sufficient.
> Thanks!
Wellllllll there still may be problems, but I think let's start simple and
build up, and see if there is something that needs to be fixed or not :)
>>
>> So the base64 is only if the attribute is "longer" than a certain amount the
>> ldapclient tools base64 it for viewing - the server actually doesn't care or
>> know that it's going on at all, so really, this is a test if binary matching
>> works.
>>
>> You can thus, setup a simpler test by setting
>>
>> with open('/tmp/test') as f:
>> data = f.readlines() # or read(), I can't remember what does it all
>> without newlines)
>> Account.set('usercertificate', data)
>> Accounts.filter('userCert=%b' % data)
>>
>> So then I'd tweak if it's %b or %s, I'd probably also to see what works and
>> prevents python leaking state or formatting.
>>
>> Then work up to a full certificate.
>>
>> If you have a failuing example, please send me the access log and -v
>> (DEBUGGING=True) lib389 output so I can help
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Viktor
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives:
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>>
>> —
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> William Brown
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
>> SUSE Labs
>> _______________________________________________
>> 389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>
>
>
> --
> Viktor
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
