On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > > Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove > it". > > I didn't say "remove", I said "review". > > > > There are some structures in the code that rely on this for performance > to guarantee that they memory is aligned to a page boundary, or cache line > boundary. In some cases it's required to allow the atomics to work in > nunc-stans (well, lfds, but the value of that today is questionable when > the rust version is possibly safer and faster). > > Since you're the expert in this area, maybe you can leave a comment in > the issue linked above with the justification for upstream to reconsider? > > You mean upstream LSAN/ASAN in this case, yes? > Yes, this https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/723 > > > — > Sincerely, > > William Brown > > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > SUSE Labs > _______________________________________________ > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Viktor
_______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
