@Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com>

>>> The code itself looks fine to me, but I find it odd you are testing
matching rules by creating COS entries in two of those PRs.

Cos entries are used here as part of  (

objectclass: extensibleObject

)

As cos template has (

objectclass: ['top','cosTemplate' , 'extensibleObject']

)

Which is the nearest one of row  extensibleObject entry.


>>> I don't think that is actually doing anything in regards to matching
rules.  I was under the impression that matching rules are only
applied/enforced during searches (not Adds or Modifies).  So you are
checking for TYPE_OR_VALUE_EXISTS errors in some of the tests, and I don't
see what that has to do with matching rules.  Or, maybe I am just missing
what this test is trying to do as I am not that familiar with MRs.  So if
you can clarify that for me I would appreciate it


Please refer bellow ldif file and TET Filter suit which is part of Filter
test suit .  To See whats going on Please see the original TET Filter suit
. (  test  series  mr_*()   )

Filter TET Script :
http://git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/git/dirsrv-tests.git/tree/testcases/DS/6.0/filter
LDIF FIle:
http://git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/git/dirsrv-tests.git/tree/data/DS/6.0/filter/en/mrsearchtests.ldif
LDIF FIle:
http://git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/git/dirsrv-tests.git/tree/data/DS/6.0/filter/en/booleanMatch.add.ldif



Regards
Anuj Borah

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:21 AM Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 7/15/19 8:00 AM, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> @Simon Pichugin <spich...@redhat.com>
>
> Please review:
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50468
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50471
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50482
>
>
> The code itself looks fine to me, but I find it odd you are testing
> matching rules by creating COS entries in two of those PRs.  I don't think
> that is actually doing anything in regards to matching rules.  I was under
> the impression that matching rules are only applied/enforced during
> searches (not Adds or Modifies).  So you are checking for
> TYPE_OR_VALUE_EXISTS errors in some of the tests, and I don't see what that
> has to do with matching rules.  Or, maybe I am just missing what this test
> is trying to do as I am not that familiar with MRs.  So if you can clarify
> that for me I would appreciate it
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
> Regards
> AB
> A
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:17 PM Anuj Borah <abo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> @Simon Pichugin <spich...@redhat.com>
>>
>> Please review:
>>
>> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50336
>>
>> Regards
>> Anuj Borah
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:50 PM Anuj Borah <abo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> @Simon Pichugin <spich...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Please review:
>>>
>>> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50328
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Anuj Borah
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:27 PM Anuj Borah <abo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Simon Pichugin <spich...@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> This one is still pending .
>>>>
>>>> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50192
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Anuj Borah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:03 PM Anuj Borah <abo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Simon ,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rebsed onto master .
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Anuj Borah
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:54 PM Simon Pichugin <spich...@redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:15:55PM +0530, Anuj Borah wrote:
>>>>>> >    Hi all,
>>>>>> Hi Anuj,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >    Please review these PRs.
>>>>>> >    Pending from Long Time.
>>>>>> >    [1]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50180
>>>>>> >    [2]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50192
>>>>>> Could you please rebase them onto master?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >    Regards
>>>>>> >    Anuj Borah
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > References
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >    1. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50180
>>>>>> >    2. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50192
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>> 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>>>>> > List Guidelines:
>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>>>> > List Archives:
>>>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>> 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>>>>> List Guidelines:
>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> --
>
> 389 Directory Server Development Team
>
>
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to