11.11.2020 22:03, Mark Reynolds пишет: > > On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote: >> >> 03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет: >>> On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux. >>>> But it is not updated since July, too stable? >>>> >>>> >>>> 1.4.x branches in upstream: >>>> >>>> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1 >>> This is no longer being maintained >>>> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2 >>> This branch is about to stop being maintained >>>> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3 >>> This would be the "most" stable branch at this time. >>>> upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4 >>>> upstream/master >>> 1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge >>> changes and features. >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Mark >> It would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at >> time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too. > > We follow the Fedora release schedule: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases?rd=Releases/ > > So... > > F34(rawhide) --> 389-ds-base-2.0.0 > > F33 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.4 > > F32 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.3 > > F31 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.2 > > Now F31 is probably going to be EOLed sooner than later, so we will stop > maintaining 1.4.2 at that time. > > > I will add something to the landing page of our wiki about this topic. >
Hi! Any news on this? Could you please point me to which branch is current stable or LTS? Thanks.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
