Changed the subject of this email as this message was filtered into my
junk folder...
On 7/15/24 1:05 PM, kamakshya nayak wrote:
I have a cascading multi setup 389-ds.
I observed that on my supplier, hub and consumer are doing good in
terms of replication.
They are healthy.
What I observe is supplier and hub is doing good with replication and
size of changelog.db for one of the backend suffix is less.
But, consumer changelog.db disk space utilization is more around 34 Gb
and supplier and hub changelog.db disk space utilization is 40 mb.
What could be the issue and why it's utilizing that high disk space
for changelog.db ?
What version of 389-ds-base are you using?
At first glance it would appear you have changelog trimming configured
on the supplier/hub but not on the consumer. That could be the issue,
or it could be changelog compaction. On the other hand a consumer does
not need a changelog so you could remove it's configuration.
Also I don't see a "changelog.db" file in my setup, so maybe you are on
a very old version?
Mark
And, why a consumer is holding changelog.db file.. where could be the
issue.
Thank you.
--
Identity Management Development Team
--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
