On 10/12/2011 04:15 PM, Justin Gronfur wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 03:07 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>> This is helpful.  Any chance you could paste the entire stack 
>> traces?  For example,
>> #0  0x0000003735c3c868 in slapi_get_mapping_tree_node_by_dn@plt () 
>> from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
>> #0  0x0000003735c4ad38 in slapi_dn_normalize_ext () from 
>> /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0
>> etc. are nice to have, but much better would be the entire stack 
>> traces of these calls so we can see where they are called from.
>
> Attached is a set of full gstack dumps taken at 1 second intervals.  
> The majority of it consists of select/poll/etc... calls that I 
> filtered out last time, but left in this time for context.
Thanks.

The select/poll are the server basically idle, waiting on a condition 
variable for new work to perform.

You can eliminate many of these by decreasing your cn=config 
nsslapd-threadnum setting.  The default is 30, but you may find better 
performance by setting to somewhere around 2 times the number of 
cpus/cores you have on your machine (but at least 8).

Do you know if any of these come from a period of time during which the 
server is consuming a lot of CPU?
>
> One of my coworkers wanted me to mention that we use long running ldap 
> connections (bound to a user's session for the duration of that 
> session unless the session is replicated to another jvm instance).  I 
> know that isn't really standard, but I don't think that should cause 
> these problems.
No, should not be a problem.  And it is standard - many apps do this 
(e.g. a web service that uses ldap for auth will not want to open/close 
a connection for every single user - it will typically use a connection 
pool of already open and possibly idle connections).
>
> Tomorrow I'm planning on writing a forking bash process to push the 
> exact same requests under the exact same load at 389 to determine if 
> it is a problem caused by the java code or container itself (by 
> eliminating them completely).  I'll keep you posted on the result of 
> this.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to