Hi all, just some easy questions. The quoted text is taken from Red Hat DS 9.0 Deployment Guide.
ยง7.4.4 Schema Replication > In all replication scenarios...[cut] The following conditions apply: > If the version of the schema ...[master has newer]...the supplicer server replicates to the consumer Q1: shouldn't this happen only when changes are done via ldapmodify (as stated in the note at the ending of the chapter)? Q2: changes made with 98example.ldif shouldn't propagate, right? > If the version of the schema...[slave has newer]...the server may return many errors... Q3: so replication still happens. I would state this clearly, like "replication happens even in case of schema mismatching" > A consumer might contain replicated data from two suppliers, each with different schema. Whichever supplier was updated last wins, and its schema is propagated to the consumer. Q4: imho it seems a wider highway to hell -_- As of Q1,2 I can avoid it using ldif, right? > Changes made to custom schema files are only replicated if the schema is updated using LDAP or the Directory Server Console Q5: I have understood that you can't change a custom schema file using LDAP/DSConsole. All modifications go to 99user.ldif: right? I hope I haven't bored you too much... Thx+Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Community Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T: +39.06.9826.9651 M: +39.340.652.2736 F: +39.06.9826.9680 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma) CONFIDENZIALE: Questo messaggio ed i suoi allegati sono di carattere confidenziale per i destinatari in indirizzo. E' vietato l'inoltro non autorizzato a destinatari diversi da quelli indicati nel messaggio originale. Se ricevuto per errore, l'uso del contenuto e' proibito; si prega di comunicarlo al mittente e cancellarlo immediatamente. -- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
