On 04/18/2012 01:33 PM, Michael Gettes wrote:

Hey russ, I've got the same problem for large groups using member... We are coming from an openldap world so not much use of uniquemember yet.


It's essentially the same problem - it doesn't matter if you use member or uniquemember.

On Apr 18, 2012 2:10 PM, "Russell Beall" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Does anybody have a pointer to any performance comparisons between
    Sun DS and 389?

    I was extremely happy with the performance boost using 389 on a
    Linux VM which is 5-8 times faster for ldapsearch operations than
    the older Sun machines with Sun DS 6.3.

    In testing one of our most important use cases just now, I find
    that the ldapmodify speed is many many times slower.  This doesn't
    make much sense, so I think I'm doing something wrong or having
    something misconfigured.

    Earlier I improved the write performance by using large db cache
    sizes and moving the nsslapd-db-home-directory to tmpfs.  Now most
    modify operations have very little I/O wait except when
    occasionally flushing the index files and such, and yet, there is
    a CPU pegged for very long periods of time, orders of magnitude
    higher than on Sun DS.

    Is there any documentation on ldapmodify performance that I could
    review?  Google searching seems eerily silent on the issue…
     (which also leads me to believe I have something misconfigured if
    nobody has been asking about the issue…)

    The particular use case I am working with involves replacing large
    quantities of uniqueMember values on entries in ou=groups.

    Thanks,
    Russ.

    ==============================
    Russell Beall
    Programmer Analyst IV
    Enterprise Identity Management
    University of Southern California
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    ==============================






    --
    389 users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users



--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to