Rich,

I don't have RHDS (389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-18.el6_3.x86_64) servers
available for tests at the moment and I've tried to reproduce this issue
on CentOS 6.3 (389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6.x86_64), but everything works
fine without modifying nsslapd-maxbersize... I've checked the
nsslapd-maxbersize value and it "0" for CentOS as well as for RHDS. What
does that mean?

Regards,
Vlad.

On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 09:04 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:02 AM, Vladimir Elisseev wrote:
> > Rich,
> >
> > I think this could be the case, thanks! This explains why initializing
> > replica using LDIF file succeeded as well! I've saved one of the entries
> > with a lot of "member" attributes and the size of just this entry is
> > over 1Mb, but maybe there's bigger... I'll be able to test it only
> > tomorrow. BTW, could it affect proper replication as well?
> 
> Yes.  You should increase the nsslapd-maxbersize
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vlad.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 08:36 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> >> On 08/14/2012 03:10 PM, Vladimir Elisseev wrote:
> >>> Rich,
> >>>
> >>> First of all thanks for helping me. Below is the error log and
> >>> corresponding access and log entries. The strange thing is that I've
> >>> done the same for "o=netscaperoot" successfully, but user data it fails.
> >>>
> >>> error log
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
> >>> multimaster_be_state_change: replica dc=cids is going offline; disabling 
> >>> replication
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] - WARNING: Import is running with 
> >>> nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to access 
> >>> the database
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] - ERROR bulk import abandoned
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> access log
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:01 +0200] conn=534 op=-1 fd=69 closed - Encountered 
> >>> end of file.
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:01 +0200] conn=525 op=18 EXT 
> >>> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.12" name="replication-multimaster-extop"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:01 +0200] conn=525 op=18 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> >>> nentries=0 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:01 +0200] conn=525 op=19 EXT 
> >>> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.5" name="Netscape Replication End Session"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:01 +0200] conn=525 op=19 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> >>> nentries=0 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:03 +0200] conn=535 fd=69 slot=69 SSL connection from 
> >>> 10.233.128.3 to 10.233.128.217
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:03 +0200] conn=535 op=-1 fd=69 closed - Encountered 
> >>> end of file.
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:03 +0200] conn=520 op=21 UNBIND
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:03 +0200] conn=520 op=21 fd=67 closed - U1
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 fd=67 slot=67 SSL connection from 
> >>> 10.233.128.216 to 10.233.128.217
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 SSL 256-bit AES
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=0 BIND dn="cn=replication 
> >>> manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 
> >>> etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 
> >>> filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 
> >>> nentries=1 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0 
> >>> filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 
> >>> nentries=1 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=3 EXT 
> >>> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.12" name="replication-multimaster-extop"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> >>> nentries=0 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=69 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> >>> nentries=0 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=70 EXT 
> >>> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.6" name="Netscape Replication Total Update 
> >>> Entry"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=70 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> >>> nentries=0 etime=0
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> a lot of the same entries as these two above
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=71 EXT 
> >>> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.6" name="Netscape Replication Total Update 
> >>> Entry"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=116 EXT 
> >>> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.6" name="Netscape Replication Total Update 
> >>> Entry"
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=116 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> >>> nentries=0 etime=0
> >>> [14/Aug/2012:13:26:04 +0200] conn=536 op=-1 fd=67 closed error 34 
> >>> (Numerical result out of range) - B2
> >> Hmm - this is very interesting - err 34 - this means the directory
> >> server received a packet that was too big.  What sorts of entries are
> >> you replicating?  Do you have very large group entries?  Try increasing
> >> the nsslapd-maxbersize in cn=config.
> >>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Vlad
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 14:24 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> >>>> On 08/14/2012 11:26 AM, Vladimir Elisseev wrote:
> >>>>> Version of 389-ds-base is 1.2.10.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Vlad.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 11:21 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 08/14/2012 10:50 AM, Vladimir Elisseev wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've problems for initializing replica from Admin console or using
> >>>>>>> ldapmodify. Although, I'm able to initialize replica from LDIF file
> >>>>>>> successfully. Below is a snip from errorlog:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ************* snip start *****************
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:04 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
> >>>>>>> multimaster_be_state_change: replica dc=cids is going offline; 
> >>>>>>> disabling replication
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:04 +0200] - WARNING: Import is running with 
> >>>>>>> nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to 
> >>>>>>> access the database
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:04 +0200] - ERROR bulk import abandoned
> >>>> Can you paste excerpts of your access log from around this time?  And
> >>>> also - when was the last EXT operation from the access log before
> >>>> 14/Aug/2012:15:09:04 +0200?
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:04 +0200] - import userRoot: Aborting all Import 
> >>>>>>> threads...
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - import userRoot: Import threads 
> >>>>>>> aborted.
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - import userRoot: Closing files...
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/cIDSMemberOf.db4: 
> >>>>>>> unable to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/mail.db4: unable to 
> >>>>>>> flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/nsuniqueid.db4: unable 
> >>>>>>> to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/id2entry.db4: unable 
> >>>>>>> to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/sn.db4: unable to 
> >>>>>>> flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/objectclass.db4: 
> >>>>>>> unable to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/ou.db4: unable to 
> >>>>>>> flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/aci.db4: unable to 
> >>>>>>> flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/cIDSEntityID.db4: 
> >>>>>>> unable to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/cn.db4: unable to 
> >>>>>>> flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/entryrdn.db4: unable 
> >>>>>>> to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/member.db4: unable to 
> >>>>>>> flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/telephoneNumber.db4: 
> >>>>>>> unable to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - libdb: userRoot/parentid.db4: unable 
> >>>>>>> to flush: No such file or directory
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - import userRoot: Import failed.
> >>>>>>> [14/Aug/2012:15:09:11 +0200] - process_bulk_import_op: NULL target sdn
> >>>>>>> ************* snip end *****************
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> These databases are for custom indexes, but I have no clue why they
> >>>>>>> aren't created automatically (all the indexes as well as custom schema
> >>>>>>> has been defined before the initialization). I'd greatly appreciate 
> >>>>>>> any
> >>>>>>> help/thoughts.
> >>>> They weren't created because it appears the replica init (bulk import)
> >>>> was aborted before it could be started.  I'd like to find out why that
> >>>> happened.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>>>>> Vlad.
> >>>>>> What are your supplier and consumer platforms?  What versions of
> >>>>>> 389-ds-base?
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> 389 users mailing list
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> >
> 


--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to