If it has the patch, what would be causing my dnanextvalue fields to not
be in sync? They're using the local value of the dnanextvalue, and when
adding a new user, the UID and GID are at the beginning of the local
value instead of matching the value on the other server.
On 2013-07-30 10:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:41 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
Sorry, I should know better. 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.x86_64
Then yes, it has that patch.
On 2013-07-30 10:38, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:09 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
I have found this bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514955), with a patch
that appears to have been applied back in 2009.
Would that patch have made it into 389?
What version of 389-ds-base are you using?
Kyle
On 2013-07-29 15:20, Kyle Johnson wrote:
Hey everyone,
The DNA plugin has been setup on my first server for a while now
and
has been working fine.
I've added a second server to the environment and configured it as
multi-master. After setting up the plugin on that server and then
adding a test user to it, the UID is starting at the bottom of the
dnanextvalue. I would like for dnanextvalue to stay in sync
between
each server in a multi-master environment.
How do you do this? Am I missing something obvious?
Kyle
-- 389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
