RHDS 9.1 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-30.el6_5.x86_64 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:55 AM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] Naming conflict on hub/consumer
On 01/21/2014 10:47 AM, Colin Tulloch wrote: Hi All – We had a bundle of problems with our MM/consumer setup. Ran of out FDs on the consumers, had the slapd process on a master die, etc. Platform? 389-ds-base version? rpm -q 389-ds-base We’re getting things back up and running properly, but having some replication issues now. We’ve got it mostly cleaned up – the masters are in sync, and all consumers but 1 hub. However, 1 hub has 3 naming conflicts on an entry. How can we resolve these? Since it’s read-only, the normal documented processes won’t work of course. The non-conflicted entry isn’t receiving updates from the masters. We use the directory for PKI, and the entry contains a CRL that is going to expire – not good. Do we need to just wait, and the actual entry will get updated at some point? With the errors we had, it seemed to take a long time for the directories to replicate around and catch up. -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
