That said I think it ignores the -X if you only have one cached credential and are using it in combination with the -Y GSSAPI option further more if you want it to prompt you for a password you need to add a -W
-- Sent from my HP Pre3
On Mar 6, 2014 17:28, Rich Megginson <[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/06/2014 03:13 PM, Robert Viduya
wrote:
We're trying to get GSSAPI authentication working with 389 and following the doc page on the website, I think I've gotten it working a little too well.
We're using the stock ldapsearch command that comes with RHN, I believe it's from openldap. Here's a command log
$ kinit [email protected]Password for [email protected]:$ klistTicket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_651342_Bepfv28166Default principal: [email protected]
Valid starting Expires Service principal03/06/14 16:55:07 03/07/14 16:55:07 krbtgt/[email protected]$ ldapsearch -Y GSSAPI -H ldap://servera.iem.gatech.edu -LLL -b '' -s base 'objectclass=*' > /dev/nullSASL/GSSAPI authentication startedSASL username: [email protected]SASL SSF: 56SASL data security layer installed.$ ldapsearch -X [email protected] -Y GSSAPI -H ldap://servera.iem.gatech.edu -LLL -b '' -s base 'objectclass=*' > /dev/nullSASL/GSSAPI authentication startedSASL username: [email protected]SASL SSF: 56SASL data security layer installed.
and here's the relevant access log entries:
[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 fd=64 slot=64 connection from 192.168.232.4 to 192.168.232.4[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=0 BIND dn="" method=sasl version=3 mech=GSSAPI[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=0 RESULT err=14 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0, SASL bind in progress[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=1 BIND dn="" method=sasl version=3 mech=GSSAPI[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=1 RESULT err=14 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0, SASL bind in progress[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=2 BIND dn="" method=sasl version=3 mech=GSSAPI[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="uid=usera,ou=accounts,ou=gtaccounts,ou=departments,dc=gted,dc=gatech,dc=edu"[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=3 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs=ALL[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=4 UNBIND[06/Mar/2014:16:55:18 -0500] conn=1387 op=4 fd=64 closed - U1[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 fd=64 slot=64 connection from 192.168.232.4 to 192.168.232.4[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=0 BIND dn="" method=sasl version=3 mech=GSSAPI[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=0 RESULT err=14 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0, SASL bind in progress[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=1 BIND dn="" method=sasl version=3 mech=GSSAPI[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=1 RESULT err=14 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0, SASL bind in progress[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=2 BIND dn="" method=sasl version=3 mech=GSSAPI[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="uid=userb,ou=accounts,ou=gtaccounts,ou=departments,dc=gted,dc=gatech,dc=edu"[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=3 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs=ALL[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=4 UNBIND[06/Mar/2014:16:55:25 -0500] conn=1388 op=4 fd=64 closed - U1
The issue is that if we do the ldapsearch without specifying an authzid (the "-X" option to ldapsearch), the bind correctly binds to DN that maps to the Kerberos principal name. However, if we specify an authzid that's different than what we kinitted to, the directory server binds to the DN that maps to that authzid even though we don't have the credentials for that user. It uses usera's credentials to bind to userb's DN.
My question is, is there a configuration setting somewhere that would make the directory server ignore any passed in authzid when using GSSAPI and just use what's in the credential cache?
Not sure, but if there is, it should be on (ignore authzid) by default. Please file a ticket.
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
