Does the admin server or admin console run a webserver? On May 29, 2014 11:59 AM, "Noriko Hosoi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, I don't know what the tool does. You may want to ask the tool's > provider the question. > Thanks. > > John Trump wrote: > > I am running RHEL 6. Why does the scan show the vulnerabilities on the > port that directory administration server is using? > On May 28, 2014 8:25 PM, "Noriko Hosoi" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, as you mentioned, all of the CVEs are quite old (older than >> RHEL-6). For instance, the last one CVE-2009-1956 was fixed in >> apr-util-1.2.7-7.el5_3.1. As long as you use RHEL-6, the CVEs you listed >> are all fixed. Also, please note that the CVEs are all httpd related, not >> 389-ds. >> >> CVE: >> CVE-2008-0005 >> CVE-2007-6388 >> CVE-2007-6422 >> CVE-2007-6420 >> CVE-2007-5000 >> CVE-2007-6421 >> CVE-2008-1678 >> >> CVE-2007-1862 >> CVE-2007-3847 >> CVE-2007-3304 >> CVE-2006-5752 >> CVE-2007-1863 >> >> CVE-2009-1891 >> CVE-2009-1955 >> CVE-2009-1191 >> CVE-2009-0023 >> CVE-2009-1956 >> CVE-2009-1195 >> CVE-2009-1890 >> >> John Trump wrote: >> >> I have a system running 389-ds that was scanned using retna. Retna showed >> vulnerabilities which are fairly old. Can anyone confirm that these were >> fixed. Only thing using port 9830 is the admin-serv. Below are the rpm >> versions I have installed and the CVE's retna supposidly detected. >> >> 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64 >> 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch >> 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64 >> 389-admin-console-1.1.8-5.fc19.noarch >> 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch >> 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch >> 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64 >> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64 >> 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64 >> 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch >> 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-5.fc19.noarch >> >> Audit ID: 6310 Vul ID: N/A >> Risk Level: Medium >> Sev Code: Category II >> PCI Level: Medium (Fail) - CVSS Score >> CVSS Score: 5 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P] >> BugTraq ID 27234,26838,27236,27237 >> CVE: CVE-2008-0005,CVE-2007-6388,CVE-2007-6422,CVE-2007-64 >> 20,CVE-2007-5000,CVE-2007-6421,CVE-2008-1678 >> CCE: N/A >> Exploit: No >> IAV: N/A >> STIG: >> Context: TCP:9830 >> Result: Success >> Tested Value: BR T WB Server: >> >> (Apache(\([[]^)]*\))?/((2\.((2(\.[[]0-7])?)|(0(\.([[]1-5]?[[]0-9]|6[[]0-2])) >> >> ?)|(1(\..*)?)))|(1\.((3(\.([[]1-3]?[[]0-9]|40))?)|([[]0-2](\..*)?)))|(0+\..*)) >> ($|[[]^0-9.]([[]^(]*\([[]^R][[]^)]*\))*[[]^()]*$)) >> Found Value: Server: Apache/2.2##Content-Length: 301##Connection: >> close##Content-Type: text/html; >> charset[=]iso-8859-1####<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC >> "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">#<html><head>#<title>404 Not >> Found</title>#</head><body>#<h1>Not Found</h1> >> (truncated...) >> >> Audit ID: 6059 Vul ID: N/A >> Risk Level: Medium >> Sev Code: Category II >> PCI Level: Medium (Fail) - CVSS Score >> CVSS Score: 5 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N] >> BugTraq ID 24215,24645,25489,24649,24553 >> CVE: CVE-2007-1862,CVE-2007-3847,CVE-2007-3304,CVE-2006-57 >> 52,CVE-2007-1863 >> CCE: N/A >> Exploit: No >> IAV: N/A >> STIG: >> Context: TCP:9830 >> Result: Success >> Tested Value: RR T WB >> >> (Apache(\([[]^)]*\))?/(2\.2(\.[[]0-5])?)($|[[]^0-9.]([[]^(]*\([[]^R][[]^)]*\) >> )*[[]^()]*$)) >> Found Value: Apache/2.2 >> >> Audit ID: 9820 Vul ID: N/A >> Risk Level: Medium >> Sev Code: Category II >> PCI Level: High (Fail) - CVSS Score >> CVSS Score: 7.8 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C] >> BugTraq ID 35565,35253,35623,35251,34663,35221,35115 >> CVE: CVE-2009-1891,CVE-2009-1955,CVE-2009-1191,CVE-2009-00 >> 23,CVE-2009-1956,CVE-2009-1195,CVE-2009-1890 >> CCE: N/A >> Exploit: Yes >> IAV: N/A >> STIG: >> Context: TCP:9830 >> Result: Success >> Tested Value: APACHE(-ADVANCEDEXTRANETSERVER)?/2\.2(\.(1[[]01]|[[]0 >> -9])(\.[[]0-9]+)*)?($|[[]^0-9.]) >> Found Value: APACHE/2.2 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing >> [email protected]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> >> >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> > > > -- > 389 users mailing > [email protected]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
