-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:59:07 -0700
Rich Megginson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/10/2014 11:22 PM, William wrote:
> > Today we added an eq index to a Directory String attribute in our
> > ds. To our surprise, it stopped matching after a reindex.
> >
> > The schema for the object does not define an equality type.
> >
> > What is the default behaviour if no equality type is defined?
> > Is there some other edge case we are potentially hitting?
> 
> 389-ds-base version?  rpm -q 389-ds-base
> 

389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-47.el6.x86_64

The exact attribute schema in question is:

attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.16 NAME ( 'mailDeliveryOption' ) DESC 
'Netscape Messaging Server 4.x defined attribute' SYNTAX 
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15  X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Messaging Server 4.x' )

The object has data such that:

uid: foo
mailDeliveryOption: forward

Note there is no trailing character at the end of forward.

Without an equality index the search:

(&(mailDeliveryOption=forward)(uid=foo))

Returns the correct result.

When the equality index is added to mailDeliveryOption, the same search yields 
no result.

- -- 
Sincerely,

William Brown

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=jZVA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to