I dumped the users to LDIF file but didn’t find anything special between the affected and unaffected users The only clue I found in the replication log is it doesn’t recognize the affected users as local (also says uid is -1) and then it deletes them.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:35 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users On 10/19/2015 09:23 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something Thanks a lot!! Sent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: Noriko Hosoi <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users Thank you for the update. Regarding this symptom: > they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest. Thanks, --noriko On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi Noriko, This is the version I have installed: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5 I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP server to sync them to AD. BTW I noticed the initial sync is deleting the same accounts. Thanks, From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:23 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users On 10/18/2015 02:06 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi, I have setup a sync agreement between directory server and active directory 2012R2 and I’m getting a very strange behavior, if I am doing 2 way sync (the default) the sync completes successfully but not all the users are created in AD, not only that , they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I’m syncing to Blank OU in AD My DS version is 1.2.2-1 Is it the version of 389-ds-base (not 389-ds)? rpm -q 389-ds-base Thanks, [cid:][cid:] Yair Mizrahi Sr Lab IT engineer Office: + 972 722563243 Mobile: + 972 54 2327687 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> EMC² - XtremIO Glil Yam 46905, Herzliya, Israel www.emc.com<http://www.emc.com/> -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
