LDAP is a protocol.
Your directory is a database.

In your scenario, if "application 1" is used in this manner, it would become an 
identity management platform.  As long as this application has the ability to 
update your directory, you can do what you are suggesting.  I would caution 
you, though, with so many accounts, and no idea what your security 
considerations are, you may wish to take a long think on this one.  That's a 
lot of potentially sensitive information.  Combining an application with your 
identity management platform on the same system will increase your risks.  From 
a complexity standpoint, if your application has the ability to act as an 
identity management platform, it may also have the ability to update your 
"application 2" system directly, and eliminate the middle-man.  Or possibly 
"application 2" could be configured to auth directly to "application 1".  
Depending on what type of user management features are available in 
"application 1".

Alexander Mayberry
Enterprise Systems Engineer
SD Group: EIT Infrastructure - OMA
Enterprise.Systems Engineering.Infrastructure

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Spooner
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [389-users] DB account master integrated with LDAP

I am using ldap to share user account information across two applications. Is 
it possible to using 'Application 1' as the central reference instead of the 
LDAP server? E.g.  Application 1' holds and maintains account information, 
which updates ldap periodically. 'Application 2' will look up LDAP for account 
informations. 'Application 1' is the main system and will hold millions of 
accounts which would operate quicker from the DB without having to refer to 
LDAP for usernames, passwords, etc. 'Application2' will require a small subset 
of users to logon using credentials of users in the master database - which can 
be done via LDAP.
--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to