Not actually. When I read the replication status as "directory manager" I
can see the agreements. It really boils down to the aci issue now.

On 18 January 2016 at 21:45, Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 01/18/2016 05:09 PM, Prashant Bapat wrote:
>
> Indeed! When I specify -h localhost it returns empty result.
>
> this indicates that you really don't have a replication agreement on this
> server, the search without localhost goes to another server.
> You can check by looking into the config file:
> /etc/dirsrv/slapd-<INSTANCE>/dse.ldif
>
>
>
> So here is the problem. I have the below aci to read the replication
> status anonymously.
>
> dn: cn=mapping tree,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> replace: aci
> aci: (targetattr=*)(targetfilter="(|(objectclass=nsds5replicationagreement)
>   (objectclass=nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement))")(version 3.0; aci
>   "permission:Read Replication Agreements"; allow (read, search, compare)
>   groupdn = "ldap:///anyone";;)
>
> I have the exact same aci which seems to work on my other servers. But on
> this one server its not working. I have double checked that the aci is
> present. Also, I'm able to read the replication status as "directory
> manager".
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
> --Prashant
>
>
>
> On 18 January 2016 at 20:45, Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01/18/2016 01:12 PM, Prashant Bapat wrote:
>>
>> It does.
>>
>> Running the ldapsearch command gives me the expected output. Below is
>> what I'm running.
>>
>> $ ldapsearch -x -b cn=config '(objectclass=nsds5replicationagreement)'
>> nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus -LLL -o ldif-wrap=no
>> dn: cn=meToipa2.example.com,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping
>> tree,cn=config
>> nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus: 0 Replica acquired successfully:
>> Incremental update succeeded
>>
>> dn: cn=meToipa3.example.com,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping
>> tree,cn=config
>> nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus: 1 Can't acquire busy replica
>>
>> dn: cn=meToipa4.example.com,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dexample\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping
>> tree,cn=config
>> nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus: 0 Replica acquired successfully:
>> Incremental update succeeded
>>
>> This also indicates that the aci is proper.
>>
>> are you sure ldapsearch runs against the same server ? If you don't
>> specify -H or -h -p it could take the target from the ldap.conf
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --Prashant
>>
>> On 18 January 2016 at 14:01, William Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 12:53 +0530, Prashant Bapat wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > There close to a dozen 389-DS as part of our FreeIPA infra. On one of
>>> > these
>>> > servers, I'm encountering a strange problem.
>>> >
>>> > We monitor the state of replication among the 389 servers using a
>>> > python-ldap based script. This works on all servers except 1.
>>> >
>>> > What I'm doing is fairly basic. Something along lines of ;
>>> >
>>> > ldapsearch -x -b cn=config '(objectclass=nsds5replicationagreement)'
>>> > nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus -LLL -o ldif-wrap=no
>>> >
>>> > Corresponding python code is below;
>>> >
>>> > conn.search_s("cn=config" ,ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE,
>>> > '(objectclass=nsds5replicationagreement)', ["nsDS5ReplicaHost",
>>> > "nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus", "nsds5replicaLastUpdateStart",
>>> > "nsds5replicaLastUpdateEnd"])
>>> >
>>> > Now for the strange issue.
>>> >
>>> > The above commands return the status of replication on all servers
>>> > except 1
>>> > which returns an empty response. This happens only for the python and
>>> > the
>>> > example perl script here
>>> > <http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-replicatio
>>> > nmonitoring.html>.
>>> > The ldapsearch command works fine!!!
>>> >
>>> > Below is the log from a server where this runs fine.
>>> >
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 fd=564 slot=564 connection
>>> > from
>>> > ::1 to ::1
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
>>> > version=3
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97
>>> > nentries=0 etime=0 dn=""
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 op=1 SRCH base="cn=config"
>>> > scope=2
>>> > filter="(objectClass=nsds5replicationagreement)"
>>> > attrs="nsDS5ReplicaHost
>>> > nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus nsds5replicaLastUpdateStart
>>> > nsds5replicaLastUpdateEnd"
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> > nentries=3 etime=0
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 op=2 UNBIND
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:09:19 +0000] conn=420951 op=2 fd=564 closed - U1
>>> >
>>> > Below is the log from the 1 server where this fails.
>>> >
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 fd=80 slot=80 connection from
>>> > ::1 to
>>> > ::1
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
>>> > version=3
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97
>>> > nentries=0
>>> > etime=0 dn=""
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 op=1 SRCH base="cn=config"
>>> > scope=2
>>> > filter="(objectClass=nsds5replicationagreement)"
>>> > attrs="nsDS5ReplicaHost
>>> > nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus nsds5replicaLastUpdateStart
>>> > nsds5replicaLastUpdateEnd"
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> > nentries=0
>>> > etime=0
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 op=2 UNBIND
>>> > [18/Jan/2016:07:05:20 +0000] conn=226 op=2 fd=80 closed - U1
>>> >
>>> > I have an ACI which allows anonymous access to the replication info.
>>> >
>>> > Version is : 389-ds-base-1.3.3.13-1.fc21.x86_64
>>> >
>>> > Any help would be appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> > --Prashant
>>> > --
>>> > 389 users mailing list
>>> > 389-users@%(host_name)s
>>> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>>> > ect.org
>>>
>>>
>>> The obvious first check is, does the server actually have a valid
>>> replication agreement? You can check this by looking at
>>> /etc/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE_NAME/dse.ldif.
>>>
>>> Second, check the aci on the server.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> William Brown
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat, Brisbane
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users@%(host_name)s
>>>
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users@%(host_name)shttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users@%(host_name)s
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@%(host_name)shttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@%(host_name)s
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to