Hi Mark, Thank you for the quick response. I’m just beginning to unravel the mysteries of replication, so I really appreciate an expert’s help.
As you can see in the screenshot, the max db csn is quite a bit ahead. Is that an indication of a problem? Should the server not try to minimize the difference? I’m theorizing that some of the changes that might occur should not be replicated — causing the RUV maxcsn to increase but not the agreement’s? Also, the Last Modify Time column for some servers shows “1/1/1970 00:00:00”. I’ve verified that that’s how it comes from the search query. What’s that an indication of? Thank you Sergei > On Oct 29, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Mark Reynolds <marey...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2017 03:20 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: >> My question now is: what’s the difference between the maxcsn of the >> agreement and the maxcsn in the RUV? > The maxcsn in the RUV is where the database is at, the agreement maxcsn > is what the repl agreement has processed. >
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
