If I run
db_dump -p memberuid.db
I see entries like this
which seems to indicate that adding the matching rule to the index definition
----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Brown" <will...@blackhats.net.au>
> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project."
> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 6:07:17 PM
> Subject: [389-users] Re: Attempting to make memberUID searches case
> On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 08:23 -0500, Patrick Landry wrote:
> > So what is the point of adding the matching rule when defining the
> > index? Is that
> > simply so that the index is built with the *capability* of supporting
> > searches using
> > that matching rule explicitly?
> I think it would be worth trying Ludwig's suggestion so we can work out
> *what's* going on. Perhaps the assumption we are making about what the
> MR does is incorrect, and it's building a supplemental index. It's good
> to check these things to understand the behaviours.
> Perhaps something else to do is check to see what content is in the
> memberuid.db file to see what indexes were added.
> Finally, did you run db2index again? I don't know if you answered this.
> 389-users mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
389-users mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines