This has been a known issue for some time.

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49525



> On 13 Jan 2020, at 22:37, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mark,
> 
> This is happens to me too, I think that is very easy to reproduce that. 
> Configure 389 to setup a self-signed certificate and enable TLS, after that 
> we import a new CA (we use a specific CA) and server-cert based on this new 
> CA. if I delete the self-signed cert (generated during the installation) the 
> 389 starts to show this error in log.
> 
> Seems that 389 works fine even with this error in log and I didn't try 
> anything to correct it.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Alberto Viana
> 
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:55 PM Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 1/10/20 6:48 PM, Iain Morgan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ,
> >
> > Yesterday, I ran up against an attribute encryption issue, and I'm
> > looking for advice on how to debug and resolve the issue.
> >
> > For background, I have a pair of RHEL 7 servers in an MMR configuration.
> > Let's call them host_A and host_B. Both are running the RedHat-provided
> > 1.3.9 RPMs of 389-ds. There is also an RHEL 6 system, host_Z, that was
> > set up in an MMR configuration with host_B. This setup was used to test
> > the transition from one generation of servers to the next one.
> >
> > All had dbeen working fine, and I next tried severing the connection
> > between host_Z and host_B. The replication agreements were removed and a
> > cleanAllRUV task was initiated on host_B. All seemed to go well -- until
> > I restarted host_A.
> >
> > After restarting host_A, I got the following in the errors log:
> >
> >
> > [09/Jan/2020:17:00:36.191870707 -0800] - ERR - attrcrypt_unwrap_key - 
> > Failed to unwrap key for cipher AES
> > [09/Jan/2020:17:00:36.192310924 -0800] - ERR - attrcrypt_cipher_init - 
> > Symmetric key failed to unwrap with the private key; Cert might have been 
> > renewed since the key is wrapped.  To recover the encrypted contents, keep 
> > the wrapped symmetric key value.
> > [09/Jan/2020:17:00:36.206041190 -0800] - ERR - attrcrypt_unwrap_key - 
> > Failed to unwrap key for cipher 3DES
> > [09/Jan/2020:17:00:36.206478885 -0800] - ERR - attrcrypt_cipher_init - 
> > Symmetric key failed to unwrap with the private key; Cert might have been 
> > renewed since the key is wrapped.  To recover the encrypted contents, keep 
> > the wrapped symmetric key value.
> > [09/Jan/2020:17:00:36.206905949 -0800] - ERR - attrcrypt_init - All 
> > prepared ciphers are not available. Please disable attribute encryption.
> >
> >
> > No change was made to the TLS certificate, and I would not have expected
> > the tear-down of the replication agreements between host_Z and host_b to
> > be relevant here. host_B is still able to replicate to host_A, but
> > host_A is unable to go in the other direction.
> >
> > I haven't identified anything that would account for this problem. The
> > system had been up from early December and had not exhibited any issues.
> >
> > So, any suggestions as to how I can troubleshoot and fix this issue? The
> > log messages don't seem to be very helpful.
> 
> I can not explain why this has happened as replication and attribute 
> encryption do not touch each other, but you can reset things by 
> following the directions from the Admin guide here:
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html/administration_guide/updating_the_tls_certificates_used_for_attribute_encryption
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Mark
> 
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> -- 
> 
> 389 Directory Server Development Team
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to