Hi there, It is indeed a problem, and a potentially annoying one at that. It's good you are bringing this up so we can resolve it.
I think it would be best to contact Red Hat / SUSE legal to get this looked at so we know what's the correct way to resolve it. Thanks, > On 4 Sep 2020, at 18:05, DUVERT Vincent <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a question regarding the licensing of developed 389-ds plugins. > > The FAQ > (https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/licensing.html#directory-server-plugin-licensing) > > indicates that the Directory Server core code is licensed under a GPL + > Exception license that allows non-GPL 389-ds plugins to link to 389-ds > and to use specific header files. > > However, the LICENSE file in the current 389-ds-base source does not > contain this exception. It was apparently removed by the following > commit, when the license was changed to GPLv3+: > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/c/88cae401aee39a19ac6b07c3c36ee8daa07192e7 > > Does that means that the license exception does not apply to the current > version of 389-ds? > > Regards, > > Vincent Duvert > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
