Hi Eugen, I think that is what was tested by Red Hat and not necessarily a hard limit.
Regards, Paul M. Whitney [email protected] Sent from my Mac Book Pro > On Sep 30, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Eugen Lamers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > We use the 389 Directory Server version 1.4.2.15. > In the documentation of the Red Hat Directory Server it says, as many as 20 > masters are supported in an MMR. It sounds to be a hardcoded limitation > defined to avoid overloaded servers and network. Shouldn't it be depending on > the MMR topology, i.e. rather on the total number of replication agreements > within the whole scenario? Or does "20 masters" indeed mean that the > limitation of the MMR topology is the number of 380 replication agreements as > shown in the "fully connected mesh" scenario > (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html/deployment_guide/designing_the_replication_process-common_replication_scenarios) > with 20 masters and 20x19 replication agreements? > Is there someone who possibly has experience with scenarios of more than 20 > master servers? > Thanks, > Eugen > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
