Mihai Carabas

> On 16 Sep 2022, at 23:12, Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 16.09.22 20:12, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 9/16/22 1:40 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 16.09.22 19:16, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 9/12/22 3:38 PM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 6:35 PM Mark Reynolds <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 9/12/22 10:58 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 10:31 PM Mihai Carabas 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 8:25 PM Mark Reynolds <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Start with the docs:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/html/administration_guide/setting_up_windows_synchronization_between_active_directory_and_directory_server#configuring_the_database_for_synchronization_and_creating_the_synchronization_agreement_using_the_command_line
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> # dsconf slapd-INSTANCE repl-winsync-agmt list
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> # dsconf slapd-INSTANCE repl-winsync-agmt set --help
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> # dsconf slapd-INSTANCE repl-winsync-agmt set --host=<NEW HOSTNAME> 
>>>>>>>>>> <AGREEMENT NAME>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> # dsconf slapd-INSTANCE repl-winsync-agmt init <AGREEMENT NAME>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I did this:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [root@ldap ~]# dsconf slapd-ldap repl-winsync-agmt list --suffix 
>>>>>>>>> "dc=curs,dc=xxx,dc=yy" | grep Host
>>>>>>>>> nsDS5ReplicaHost: ad-tttt-01.curs.xxx.yy
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> But in the logs:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [09/Sep/2022:22:23:43.366356845 +0300] - INFO - NSMMReplicationPlugin 
>>>>>>>>> - windows sync - windows_tot_run - Beginning total update of replica 
>>>>>>>>> "agmt="cn=ad.curs.xxx.yy" (ad:636)".
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> And it connects to the old server (ad:636) [the old was 
>>>>>>>>> ad.curs.xxx.yy]. From where is getting that ad?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Any input here? A reboot is needed? Dropping changelog?
>>>>>>> Try a server restart "dsctl slapd-ldap restart".  If it still pulling 
>>>>>>> in that old host then maybe you have an extra/conflicting agreement?  
>>>>>>> "cn=ad.curs.xxx.yy" refers the DN of the replication agreement.  So 
>>>>>>> check if that is the same DN of the agreement you have been modifying.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> restart worked like a charm.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there a way to find out what config changes needs restart? (for 
>>>>>> future reasons)
>>>>> Well in this case a replication agreement is processed at server startup 
>>>>> or when it is first created.  The server will spawn a separate thread for 
>>>>> each replication agreement.  Changes to things like port and hostname are 
>>>>> not picked up in this agreement thread.  So all changes to a replication 
>>>>> agreement's configuration will require a server restart.
>>>>> 
>>>> Are you sure ?
>>>> 
>>> No :-)
>>> 
>>> Well changing the host name is only picked up on new replication 
>>> connections.  So if the connection is long lived it will not pick up on the 
>>> change.  Maybe that's what was happening here?  
>>> 
>> but there is agmt_set_host_from_entry() which calls 
>> prot_notify_agmt_changed(), so it should be picked up
The connection to the AD we should presume that was a long one.

>>> We have/had a function "prot_notify_agmt_changed" which sets the state to 
>>> EVENT_AGMT_CHANGED and the state machin will capture this and restart the 
>>> incremantal protocol.
>>> 
>>> Ludwig
>>> 
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Directory Server Development Team
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>> List Archives: 
>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>>>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: 
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>> -- 
>> Directory Server Development Team
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to