On 30.08.2024 17:33, Pierre Rogier wrote:
For healthcheck, I see 2 possibilities:
[1] NSSLAPD_DB_LIB=bdb is set in your environment (saying lib389 that
bdb is used ...)
[2] There is a bug somewhere. (which seems a bit weird since 'dsconf
supplier1 backend config get' is working as expected ...)
BTW, Which exact 389-ds-base version are you using ? and on
which platform ?
[1] NSSLAPD_DB_LIB doesn't seem to be here
[2] 389-ds-base 2.5.2 on CentOS Stream 9
Thanks
--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
