Hello,

I have a two-node 389ds cluster with Oracle Linux 9.7 x64 servers running 389 version 2.4.6 (compiled following the instructions from the official page of 389ds).
Each server is a VM with 4vcpus and 10GB RAM on fast FC SSD storage.

The cluster until now is used for testing and is running pretty well with over 150.000 records. The DNA plugin is enabled to each server for the uidnumber attribute (using different range in each server). On our latest tests we discovered that during an import (using ldapmodify with ldif file) of an single user it takes around 8 seconds to complete the import when the DNA plugin is used to auto allocate the uidnumber. 8 seconds is a lot for a single import!! When the same import is done, without using the DNA plugin (the ldif file defines the uidnumber), the import is completed instantly.

I tried to found out what maybe caused the delay (for example the replication between the servers) but i havent managed to find anything. I also disabled the replication for testing, but nothing changed.

As the 2.4.6 version is not the latest of the 2.x series, i installed another two-node 389ds cluster with Oracle Linux 9.7 x64 servers running 389 version 2.7.0 (compiled also by following the instructions from the official page of 389ds). I did the same import tests, but the time did not change. When using the DNA plugin the import of a single user ldif takes 8 seconds.

The funny thing is, that when using our older two-node 389ds cluster with Centos 7 x86  servers running 389 version 1.3.7 the import with the DNA plugin is completed instantly.

Any ideas why the DNA plugin is so slow in versions 2.4.6 and 2.7.0??

Antonis Kopsaftis
--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to