No need for duplicates as long as I don't care about having any pre-emptive processes, right? In the current design, the method that starts the process and every method in it's call chain must have only pre-emptive commands if I want it to run in pre-emptive mode. Correct?
John DeSoi, Ph.D. > On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:46 PM, Keisuke Miyako <[email protected]> wrote: > > the idea is to leave all method properties to "agnostic", > and only set "preemptive" for methods that specifically start a process > (=thread); > via New process, Execute on server, or a menu item. > > all generic subroutines will simply inherit the property of the thread in > which it was called. > > no need for duplicates. ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
