that is absolutely right. the syntax and behaviour of "Find in sorted array" was modified during the beta phase of 14R4, "Following a feedback received from the customer who was the source of the feature request"
Implementation changes in feature "Find in array by dichotomy" (2014) http://forums.4d.fr/Post/FR/15548126/1/15548127#15548127 > 2017/01/15 8:13、Arnaud de Montard <[email protected]> のメール： > > You have to know that, at the very beginning, that car had no wheel :-) > (translated from french) > "Binary search in array is great. But something's missing IMHO. > Where do I insert the value in the array if it is not found? > Seems obvious this information goes along with a binary search. > We would not have to sort every time we add a value, > especially if several arrays are synchronized." 宮古 啓介 セールス・エンジニア 株式会社フォーディー・ジャパン 〒150-0043 東京都渋谷区道玄坂1-10-2 渋谷THビル6F Tel: 03-6427-8441 Fax: 03-6427-8449 [email protected] www.4D.com/JP ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
