[JPR] Hi David,
> I find it deeply disturbing that a representative of 4D France somehow > thinks that basic error checking is a weird thing to worry about I just would like to correct this: - I'm not a representative of 4D France, just a contractant. - I do not talk in the name of 4D in general. I just express my own feeling (or opinion), like you do yourself. This feeling is just based on my own experience. - I do not pretend to detain the absolute truth, and, during trainings, I always say that I recommend to do so and so, and never say that this is the only way. - I'm curious to know in which one of my postings you have found the following sentence "that basic error checking is a weird thing to worry about". I prefer to see the glass half full than half empty, this is my way of thinking, because I think it's a more positive way. But, here also, I just express my opinion, and you're perfectly right to think the contrary. This is the way things are going on, because thread springs light. (De la discussion jaillit la lumière. — Charles Monnard) And, as my friend Thibault was used to say: "Progressons! - Spinoza" (Let's get forward!) My very best, JPR > On 08 May 2017, at 19:27, [email protected] wrote: > Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 09:04:56 +1000 > From: David Adams <[email protected]> > To: 4D iNug Technical <[email protected]> > ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
