> On Oct 17, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Keisuke Miyako wrote: > >> 2017/10/13 6:27、Tim Nevels via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> のメール： >> Does anyone see anything wrong with this code: >> $image_c:=ZINT >> ($barcode_t;ZINT_Format_PNG;BARCODE_CODE128;$optionNames_al;$optionValues_at;$textData_t) > > the problem seems to be coming from a LIBPNG function failing on Windows. > (you could have used the SVG option and convert to PNG with native 4D > commands, which results in superior image quality)
Thank you Miyako for fixing the problem. But why is the image quality superior if you first create an SVG and then convert to PNG. I need PNG image as the end result, so I thought why do the extra SVG step. Are you saying that 4D’s SVG to PNG conversion is superior to the plugin’s SVG to PNG conversion? Tim ******************************************** Tim Nevels Innovative Solutions 785-749-3444 [email protected] ******************************************** ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
