Yes - once more illustrating that just because we could do something does not mean we should.
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 11:58 AM Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech < [email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 19 mai 2018 à 20:22, Kirk Brooks via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> > a écrit : > > > > I don't even know if 4D > > supports tables with more than 1000 fields (probably does now) but that > > just seems like incredibly - esoteric - design, at best. > > 2^32 is the max for fields and tables. > Using sql we could create that monster ;-) -- Kirk Brooks San Francisco, CA ======================= *We go vote - they go home* ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
