Viewing the logs in a web browser is painful, especially on large structures. I 
open the log in a text editor and look for strings like “warning” or “Error”. 
Notepad++ has a good search feature which will list all the occurrences in 
context.

HTH,

Tom

> On Dec 10, 2019, at 11:14, Eric Naujock <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The other thing that comes to mind is what are you looking at the report 
> with. I know safari really does not do a good job of viewing the report. I 
> have found Firefox handles it better. But if there is a report of anomalies 
> it should be in the report somewhere.
> 
>> On Dec 10, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Mitchell Shiller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Tom and Eric. Unfortunately, I deleted both the .4DIndx and .4DIndy 
>> files. Let them rebuild. 
>> Verified the structure and still get anomalies that were found.
>> But none highlighted or specified. In the Log Report.
>> 
>> Any other thoughts before I head off to tech support.
>> 
>> Appreciated, as always.
>> 
>> Mitch
>> 
>>> On Dec 10, 2019, at 1:43 PM, Tom Benedict <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Some years ago I adopted the habit of always deleting the .4DIndy file (the 
>>> structure index) when deploying .4DC files. I adopted this as a best 
>>> practice after a number of ‘weird behavior’ episodes during deployment. It 
>>> may be superstition, but the overhead for 4D to recreate the .4DIndy is 
>>> very low, so I continue to do it.
>>> 
>>> As you say, rebuilding a .4DIndx can take a lot longer, especially on large 
>>> data files. I only do it as part of routine maintenance. 
>>> 
>>> In this case I think you should consider deleting both, Mitch, and letting 
>>> 4D rebuild them.
>>> 
>>> Tom Benedict
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 10, 2019, at 09:41, Eric Naujock via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I have seen cases where the index files get messed up. For my small 
>>>> databases I just delete the index files and let 4D regenerate them. But 
>>>> for big databases it may take a while to rebuild them.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 5:50 PM, Mitchell Shiller via 4D_Tech 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Went to verify my structure today after a week of coding. I noticed no 
>>>>> anomalies or issue with the db but I like to make sure all is OK.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Verification reports that anomalies are found. But when I check the log, 
>>>>> none are highlighted.
>>>>> I ran a repair 2X. A compact. 
>>>>> But verification still reports anomalies.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking through the structure, the Trash has been emptied and there are 
>>>>> no orphan methods or forms that I can see.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Help!
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is this an issue for Tech Support.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mitch
>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
>>>>> Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
>>>>> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
>>>>> Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>> 
>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
>>>> Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
>>>> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
>>>> Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
>>>> **********************************************************************
>>> 
>> 
> 

**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to