Thanks for the reply Chuck.

>Does it crash immediately? If not perhaps there is an index problem.
It doesn’t crash. It just doesn’t generate the report. I dropped and rebuilt 
indexes. Also tried totally different data files.

>What happens with only one record on the report?  Also what 4D
>version, and O/S combination  are you running in?
This is under Windows 10, 4D 17.3hf2. I will try it in v18.

Tom

> On Feb 25, 2020, at 11:49, Charles Miller via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Does it crash immediately? If not perhaps there is an index problem.
> What happens with only one record on the report?  Also what 4D
> version, and O/S combination are you running in?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Chuck
> 
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:20 PM Tom Benedict via 4D_Tech
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> It’s been many years since I’ve done much with Quick Reports, but now a 
>> customer has reported that a specific Quick Report template that they use is 
>> no longer working. The “Print Preview” and “Print” icons in the QR Toolbar 
>> are enabled, but clicking on them does “nothing” (no report is generated). 
>> Only if the two columns which reference fields in one of the related tables 
>> are removed will the report generate. There are other columns which 
>> reference related fields in other tables, and they work fine, but using 
>> fields from this one related table stops report generation.
>> 
>> I’ve tried rebuilding the report from scratch, but once I add a column from 
>> the troublesome table, the report stops generating. I’ve confirmed that the 
>> tables are related (actually deleted and recreated the relation) and I’ve 
>> tried adding a calculated column which holds a query to relate the tables. 
>> And I tried rebuilding using the QR Wizard. I’ve also tried it on different 
>> data files.
>> 
>> The customer reports that this QR template worked until we gave them a new 
>> structure file. Unfortunately we don’t have the source code for their prior 
>> build, so I can’t compare structures, but I don’t see any evidence of recent 
>> schema changes which may have introduced this behavior.
>> 
>> Is there something obvious I’ve overlooked?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Tom Benedict

**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to