Hi Miyako, Both of those versions work OK. No error messages, compiles OK, seems to work correctly both compiled and uncompiled.
BR Pat On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 02:53, Keisuke Miyako via 4D_Tech < [email protected]> wrote: > after some tests, here is what I found: > > if I notarise the plugin and staple the dmg, > only the dmg passes stapler validation. > as for the bundle inside the dmg, nothing is reported (neither error nor > success). > > if staple the bundle after notarisation, > create a new dmg from it, > notarise and staple that dmg (which contains a bundle that itself is > already stapled), > the dmg as well as the bundle inside it both passes stapler validation. > > I think it would be beneficial to all plugin developers, > to know whether the second round is really necessary or not. > > so here is a test case: > > @Pat. > > could you please try > > https://github.com/miyako/4d-plugin-zint/releases/tag/2.3.1 > > which is single-stapled, > > then compare the results with > > https://github.com/miyako/4d-plugin-zint/releases/tag/2.3.2 > > which is double-stapled? > > this is a version of ZINT that takes the old syntax. > > ********************************************************************** > 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) > Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html > Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech > Unsub: mailto:[email protected] > ********************************************************************** -- ************************************************* CatBase - Top Dog in Data Publishing tel: +44 (0) 207 118 7889 w: http://www.catbase.com skype: pat.bensky ************************************************* ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
