WOW. It actually does work to use a formula, but that SUCKS as far as user interfaces go. It gives you the interface you'd expect (for selecting related tables/all tables) in the formula editor. As long as field names resolve properly, it should work. But, YUCK!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:53 PM Tim Nevels via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 5, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Doug Hall wrote: > > > A few weeks ago, we switched to 4D v17 (64-Bit) so that our users could > run > > Catalina. Today, a user showed me that you can't dig more than one table > > away from the current table, in the new 64-bit Quick Report Editor. Are > we > > missing something, or is there a way around this? > > My users noticed it too. 4D needs to fix this in a future version. > > You can try doing calculated column and manually entering in the related > field reference. It think that will work. But it’s a lot of work for the > user compared to just selected a field from the field list. > > Tim > > ***************************************** > Tim Nevels > Innovative Solutions > 785-749-3444 > [email protected] > ***************************************** > > ********************************************************************** > 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) > Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html > Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech > Unsub: mailto:[email protected] > ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
