Aparajita:

"Don’t be so quick to complain; you finally got ‘for each’ 10 years after
the rest of the world (including Active4D).”
Good point. So…you’re thinking that the feature set is complete?

"I don’t know of a single language (and I have used at least 6) where ‘for
each’ is reversible.”
This could be 4D’s chance to be a trendsetter!

"Indexed loops haven’t gone away and have their uses.”
No doubt. I have to use them often when working with collections. Frankly,
it’s funny that we have such a handy looping construct yet I have write
code to init and update my own index. How about using “++" to increment?

--
Douglas von Roeder
949-910-4084


On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 1:32 PM Aparajita Fishman via 4D_Tech <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> >> Another WTF is that you can’t iterate from the end of a collection to
> the
> >> start. You can reorder the collection and then run a For each loop but
> >> that’s a complete kludge.
>
> Don’t be so quick to complain; you finally got ‘for each’ 10 years after
> the rest of the world (including Active4D). I don’t know of a single
> language (and I have used at least 6) where ‘for each’ is reversible.
> Indexed loops haven’t gone away and have their uses.
> **********************************************************************
> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
> Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
> Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
> **********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to