Hi Steve, |--==> Steve A writes:
SA> OK thanks, got it installed. SA> I still have a problem, because I can't do an apt-get update. SA> It looks like my system is expecting a signed key. SA> W: GPG error: http://apt.64studio.com etch Release: The following SA> signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1CC1348879ADCDD1 APT Archive from 64 SA> Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SA> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems SA> I think I have screwed a local setting, how can I reset things and SA> rebuild the local key list? I'm not sure what's wrong with your system, anyway you should be able to re-import the key by running: dpkg --reconfigure 64studio-apt or apt-get install --reinstall 64studio-apt Ciao! Free >>From: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Steve A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>CC: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [64 Studio] #365: 2.6.22 kernel upgrade breaks nvidia xorg >>Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:25:55 +0200 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Received: from serverina.hacknight.org ([80.68.90.101]) by >>bay0-mc3-f21.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); >>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:26:02 -0700 >>Received: from 64studio (host52-6.pool80183.interbusiness.it >>[80.183.6.52])by serverina.hacknight.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id >>552C2140CE;Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:25:59 +0100 (BST) >>X-Message-Info: >>JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Z3TmmkSEdPt3Mi6GgUSv7yYKHQgGfDe+2wCW4LegkYQqypIHu4uP4o= >>Organization: 64 Studio >>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) >>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2007 13:26:02.0921 (UTC) >>FILETIME=[29F09990:01C7DC1B] >> >>Hi Steve, >> >>the backport repo is not signed, you should be able to use apt-get >>install by answering "yes" to the question about security.. >> >>Ciao! >> >>Free >> >>|--==> Steve A writes: >> SA> Thanks Free! That has fixed it. SA> However, >> SA> I have a new problem, >> SA> I can't do a apt-get update with backports enabled: >> SA> W: GPG error: http://apt.64studio.com etch Release: The following SA> signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1CC1348879ADCDD1 APT Archive from 64 SA> Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> SA> I may have screwed-up something here because I interrupted an >>aptitude SA> update. >> SA> Is this a genuine problem with the repository, or do I have to reset SA> keys locally? >> SA> _________________________________________________________________ SA> Booking a flight? Know when to buy with airfare predictions on MSN SA> >>Travel. http://travel.msn.com/Articles/aboutfarecast.aspx&ocid=T001MSN25A07001 SA> _________________________________________________________________ SA> See what youre getting intobefore you go there SA> http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507 _______________________________________________ 64studio-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
